Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
D.C.
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Mass.
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N.Carolina
N.Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
S.Carolina
S.Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
W.Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Law Firm Website Design Companies : The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly


WASHINGTON – A Cross Lanes, W. Va. man has been convicted of producing, receiving, and possessing child pornography, Assistant Attorney General Alice S. Fisher of the Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Charles T. Miller of the Southern District of West Virginia announced today.

Following a five-day jury trial that began last Wednesday, David A. Hicks was found guilty on two counts of producing child pornography, two additional counts of possessing child pornography, and one count of receiving child pornography over the Internet. The trial was held in U.S. District Court in Charleston, W. Va. and U.S. District Court Judge Joseph R. Goodwin presided.

The evidence presented at trial demonstrated that Hicks, a father of two girls under the age of ten, frequently had his older daughter’s friends spend the night as guests. Five of these juveniles, girls between the ages of nine and 12, testified that Hicks frequently took photos of them while they were at the home, commented on his ability to see through their clothing, walked in on them while they were changing or bathing, watched and photographed them through the blinds of the home while they were swimming in his pool, and physically touched more than one of them inappropriately. Hicks stored photos of the girls on his computer in a special archive folder, including photos of his daughter’s friends either nude or partially nude. The two charges of production of child pornography were based on two photos taken in Hicks’s bathtub that depicted one of the girls in a sexually suggestive position.

Evidence at trial also revealed that Hicks was a trained computer expert who maintained a computer in his bedroom that had four separate hard drives. These hard drives contained thousands of images and movies of children engaged in sexually explicit conduct. The images on these hard drives were the basis of one of the possession charges. Investigators also testified that they seized several CDs from Hicks’ bedroom that contained similar images of prepubescent children engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Finally, forensic analysis of the computers and CDs revealed that Hicks searched for sexually explicit movie clips of children using a peer-to-peer file-sharing program, and then downloaded the movie clips to his computer. Hicks’s use of the Internet to download movie clips containing graphic images of prepubescent children engaged in sexually explicit conduct was the basis of the receipt charge.

Sentencing is currently set for April 19, 2007. Hicks faces a minimum sentence of 15 years and up to 30 years in prison for each of the two production charges, a minimum sentence of 5 years and up to 15 years in prison for the receipt charge, and up to 10 years in prison for each of the two possession charges. The judge also approved the forfeiture of the child pornography and related computer equipment seized during the investigation.

This case was investigated by Special Agents Mike Ritzman and Jack Remaly of the FBI. The forensic analysis was conducted by Melinda Cash of the FBI’s Computer Analysis Response Team. The case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anna Forbes of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia and Trial Attorney Steve Grocki of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Criminal Division.


Legal News | Breaking News | Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Law Firm Web Design by Law Promo

ⓒ Breaking Legal News. All Rights Reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by BLN as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case.
   More Legal News
   Legal Spotlight
   Exclusive Commentaries
   Attorney & Blog - Blog Watch
   Law Firm News  1  2  3  4  5  6 
   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
www.onulawfirm.com
Chicago Business Lawyer
Cook County Contract Law
www.rothlawgroup.com
Canton Criminal Lawyer
Canton DUI lawyer
www.cantoncriminalattorney.com
Surry County Criminal Defense Lawyers
Yadkin County Family Law Attorneys
www.dirussolaw.com
Oregon DUI Law Attorney
Eugene DUI Lawyer. Criminal Defense Law
www.mjmlawoffice.com
Palm Beach Construction Law Attorney
Florida Construction Law
Wellington Construction Law
palmbeachconstructionlaw.org
Houston Car Accident Attorneys
Wrongful Death Attorneys Houston
Houston Wrongful Death
New York Adoption Lawyers
New York Foster Care Lawyers
Adoption Pre-Certification
www.lawrsm.com
Indianapolis personal injury lawyer
Brain injury lawyer Indianapolis
www.rwp-law.com
Eugene Bankruptcy Attorney
Bankruptcy Attorney Eugene
willamettevalleybankruptcy.com
   More Legal News  1  2  3  4  5  6
   Legal News Links
  Click The Law
  Daily Bar News
  The Legal Voice
  The Legal Report
  Legal News Post
  Crisis Legal News
  Legal News Journal
  Law Firm Logos
  Eugene Criminal Defense Law
  Attorney Web Design
  Simple Lawyer Web Design
  Law Firm Directory